NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  Service via Facebook attachment?

    Posted 11-16-2016 05:54 PM
    Never married parents. Client (mom) lives in New Jersey with the parties' son. Dad, who lives in Spain (and has had only sporadic contact with son), has threatened that he will come and kidnap the child and remove him from the USA. Preparing an order to show cause. Here's the problem - dad won't give his address. All mom knows is that he lives in Madrid, Spain.  We do, however, have a Facebook page that he accesses regularly.

    Would it be ridiculous to ask to serve dad via substituted service / PDF attachment to a FaceBook message?

    Thanks,



    <x-sigsep>

    David Perry Davis, Esq.
    ----------------------------------------------------
       www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
    ----------------------------------------------------
    112 West Franklin Avenue
    Pennington, NJ 08534
    Voice: 609-737-2222
    Fax:    609-737-3222

    </x-sigsep>


  • 2.  RE: Service via Facebook attachment?

    Posted 11-16-2016 06:13 PM

    Novel, certainly, but probably more likely to actually reach him than service by publication would be!

     

    C. Megan Oltman

    Oltman Law & Mediation

    475 Wall St

    Princeton, NJ 08540

    http://moltmanlaw.com

    (609) 947-0784

     

    This communication is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the email.

    A telephone or in person consultation does not mean I am retained as your attorney. I am only retained if we have both signed a retainer agreement, and I have received the agreed upon retainer deposit from you. Consultation sessions are payable at the time services are rendered.
     
    FEDERAL TAX NOTICE - IRS rules restrict tax advice by attorneys. I am not an accountant. No advice in this correspondence is intended to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under federal tax laws. Please consult with an accountant for tax advice.
     
    I appreciate your referrals!

     






  • 3.  RE: Service via Facebook attachment?

    Posted 11-16-2016 06:13 PM
    It has been done, though not in a NJ case yet (to the best if my knowledge).

    Leslie A. Farber
    Attorney at Law
    33 Plymouth Street, Suite 204
    Montclair, NJ 07042
    Ph. (973) 509-8500
    Fax: (973) 860-1174
    Sent from my iPhone
    Note: The contents of this electronic message are intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or opinion in any specific facts or circumstances. Confidentiality Note: This electronic message transmission contains information from Leslie A. Farber, LLC, which may be confidential, privileged, or otherwise protected from disclosure.  The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed above.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
    IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in, omitted from, or implied by this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.






  • 4.  RE: Service via Facebook attachment?

    Posted 11-16-2016 06:34 PM
    I believe last year a NY Court allowed for it. (Obviously look at that case and see if it can be applicable. to NJ.)


    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE


    The information contained in this communication is similar to ordinary telephone conversations and does not reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry which would be applied in the event a formal opinion was rendered by this firm. The information may also be confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this communication is intended to constitute a waiver of any privilege of the confidentiality of this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. This firm accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from the use or receipt of this message and/or any attachments hereto, including any damage caused by virus.

    [email protected]


    Allan Weinberg, Esq.
    100 Craig Road, Suite 102
    Manalapan, New Jersey 07726
    Telephone: (732) 80 NJ LAW
        (732) 806-5529      Voice/Text 24/7 Access

    Telefax: 732.845.0144

    Twitter:       AllanWEsq
    LinkedIn: AllanWeinberg
    Google+:  Allan Weinberg
    Google+ Allan Weinberg, Attorney At law





     





  • 5.  RE: Service via Facebook attachment?

    Posted 11-16-2016 06:51 PM

    David,

    As to notice of persons outside state, New Jersey’s Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”) requires that “Notice shall be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, but may be by publication if other means are not effective.” N.J.S.A. 2A:34-60 (emphasis added). 

    I have this issue right now in Mercer County.  Child's father is in Italy and has refused international Fed Ex delivery of papers.  I "served" dad via email.  Take a look at Modan v. Modan, 327 N.J. Super. 44, 48-49 (App.Div.2000)

    The Appellate Division in Modan v. Modansupra, held that effective service by publication was improper when plaintiff knows of defendant's email address.  The parties in Modan attempted to work out the terms of a property settlement but defendant, nevertheless, departed for Pakistan.  When settlement negotiations failed, plaintiff’s attorney corresponded with defendant’s attorney to determine if defendant’s attorney would be willing to accept service of the complaint for divorce which was being drafted.  Defendant’s attorney refused and certified that the complaint would have to be served on the defendant in Pakistan.  When plaintiff filed his complaint for divorce, he alleged that defendant lived at her mother’s address in New Jersey.  The trial court denied defendant’s motion to vacate the resulting judgment.  The Appellate Division reversed, holding that evidence of phone calls and email made it clear that plaintiff knew of defendant’s whereabouts.  Had plaintiff been forthright to the trial court about his actual knowledge of defendant’s whereabouts, it would have been apparent that a method was available to to plaintiff for reasonably effecting actual notice to defendant.  Thus, the holding of the Modan court suggests that service or at least notice via email is preferable to an alternative method of service. 

    ------------------------------
    Michael J. Fleres, Esq.
    Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Law Attorney

    PARAS, APY & REISS, P.C.
    A Professional Corporation for the Practice of Family Law
    2 BRIDGE AVENUE | THE GALLERIA, SUITE 601 | RED BANK, NEW JERSEY 07701
    phone: (732) 219-9000 | fax: (732) 219-9020 | email: [email protected]