Does anyone know of a case that says that "retirement" under the new alimony statute (or even old law) meant that a payor was no longer working, not just retired from his primary occupation? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Charles F. Vuotto, Jr., Esq.
Starr, Gern, Davison & Rubin, P.C.
Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Law Attorney
Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
Certified by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers as an Arbitrator
Qualified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as an Economic Mediator
2016 Tischler Award Winner given by the NJSBA
for Lifetime Achievement in Family Law
105 Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 401
Roseland, NJ 07068
Tel. 973-403-9200, Ext. 246
Fax 973-364-1403
E-Fax 973-303-4055
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.starrgern.com
Website: www.vuotto.com