NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only

RECUSE

  • 1.  RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 08:38 AM

    Mates,

    I need to file a motion asking a judge to recuse himself.  Does anyone have a sample I could peruse? 

    Thank you,

    ------------------------------
    Andrew Bestafka Esq.
    Freehold NJ
    (732)955-2050
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 09:28 AM

    Have you tried correspondence first? Outside of a few limited circumstances, like relatives of the Judge becoming suddenly sucked in to the process, it would have to be something rather dramatic. But, I am sure you know that.

    They have an enormous amount of discretion here, and can do so, absent a motion and, from the SCOTUS Justice level right on down, jurists do not have a reason for recusing themselves.

    If you end up filing a motion, there's really no magic in the language. It would be case specific.

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585



  • 3.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:02 AM

    Andrew

    Follow the Court Rule and comments to establish the requisite standard.  It is in all respects a regular motion, just uncomfortable to argue.

    It is hard to ask a Judge to take him/herself off a case, especially if the motion is denied. So be as respectful as possible while making your points.

    Write a good brief and solid certification. Your client's cert needs to say s/he feels uncomfortable proceeding before the Judge for the reasons stated, and they need to be solid reasons.  The standard is objective.

    I have filed 2 such motions over the years, neither of them recently. One was denied, and we went on to win the bench trial despite my stated concerns. The other was granted.

    Hanan


    hanan.gif

    Hanan M. Isaacs, Esq.

     

    t 609.683.7400   f 609.921.8982

    e [email protected]   w www.hananisaacs.com

    4499 Route 27, Kingston NJ






  • 4.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:24 AM
    I would ask for an in chambers conference first 

    Sent from my iPhone





  • 5.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:32 AM

    Billy makes my point as well. Write a letter requesting a conference (definitely in Chambers and not on the phone, if at all possible). That will either resolve the issue, or give you more intel to share with your client.

    Making this motion is a big step. Proceed carefully, and only if you really need to.

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585



  • 6.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:54 AM
    I agree with Curtis and Billy 100%. Keep in mind that you may not prevail on the recusal request and, absent something truly compelling, the App Div isn't going to reverse on this basis. I like to think that judges are too professional to take things personally and, even if they did, too professional to thereafter let it affect a decision on the merits, but that's not always the case. The point is that you may end up litigating before this judge, so (1) keep it professional and respectful, (2) make sure you have a solid basis for asking.

    True story (not a Family Law attorney):

    <x-tab>        </x-tab>Marty Indik: Judge, I have to ask that you recuse yourself from hearing this matter
    <x-tab>        </x-tab>Judge: And why the hell would I do that??
    <x-tab>        </x-tab>Marty: Because my adversary is your son!


    <x-sigsep></x-sigsep>

    - Dave

    David Perry Davis, Esq.
    ----------------------------------------------------
       www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
    ----------------------------------------------------
    112 West Franklin Avenue
    Pennington, NJ 08534
    Voice: 609-737-2222
    Fax:    609-737-3222






  • 7.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 12:47 PM

    I had one where my client was sleeping with the Judges daughter and he did not know it…very sensitive and dealt with in chambers.

     

    William M. Laufer, Esq.

    Laufer, Dalena, Cadicina, Jensen & Boyd, LLC

    23 Cattano Avenue

    Morristown, New Jersey 07960

    Tel:  973-285-1444

    Fax: 973-285-0271

    www.lauferfamilylaw.com

     

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains information that is privileged and confidential and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use. You are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using this information if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments from your system. Thank You.

     

     

    IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

     






  • 8.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 03:09 PM

    Billy... Your client didn't know it or the Judge didn't know it, and what, specifically was dealt with in Chambers? Kidding, as usual. Always start with a sit-down in Chambers.

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585



  • 9.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 04:44 PM
    Was your client male or female?

    Sent from my iPhone




  • 10.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 04:49 PM
    Male. Can you guess the judge 10 years ago



    Sent from my iPhone





  • 11.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 04:57 PM

    Inappropriate exchange. I'm not a prude; I just think that's the type of talk that can  get you in trouble.

     

    Ashenfelter logo

     

    Ashenfelter, Slous, McDonough & Trevenen, LLP

    W. Thomas McDonough, Jr.

    363 Bloomfield Avenue Suite 2C
    Montclair, NJ 07042
    973-744-2100 (phone)
    973-509-9521 (fax)

     

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE

     

    This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law offices of Ashenfelter, Slous, McDonough & Trevenen, LLP which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all attachments.

     

    Although we have made every effort to safeguard this e-mail and any attachments against viruses, there is no guarantee that this message is virus free. It is the recipient's responsibility to protect against viruses and other defects that may result from the opening of this e-mail or any attachments hereto.

     






  • 12.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 04:57 PM

    What county?  Still sitting?

     

    Craig Dodd 

    Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP
    Serving our Clients and Community for Over 100 Years
    220 Park Avenue | PO Box 991
    Florham Park, NJ 07932
    Phone: 973-540-7325
    Fax:  973-540-7300

    Email: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.spsk.com
    Bio: View my Bio



    Confidentiality Notice:
    This message contains information intended for the use of the addressee only, which may be privileged and confidential. If you are not an addressee, any review, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited; If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately.






  • 13.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:52 AM

    Sandra lastly argues that if we remand for further proceedings, we should direct that  

    the matter be handled by a different trial judge.  She claims the judge exhibited a "callous indifference to her emotional frailties," a "blatant prejudice" and "bias" against her, and a

     "disregard of any and all evidence" presented by her.  She also contends that reassignment is called for because the trial judge made credibility findings against her and cannot now be expected to reexamine the matter with an open mind.  We do not agree there are grounds for the judge's disqualification.  We do recognize, however, that judges may at times find it difficult when a matter is remanded to cast off their commitment to earlier findings...After careful consideration, we conclude that the interests of  justice would best be served by having the remand proceedings completed by another judge.  We direct the assignment judge or presiding judge of the family part to reassign the case.   

    Richards v. Richards, New Jersey App. Div., April 28, 2015

    ------------------------------
    Charles Abut Esq.
    Hackensack NJ
    (201)342-0404



  • 14.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-19-2015 11:18 AM

    I have observed Richards-type situations with increasing frequency. However, this happens when the Judge has been found to have erred or misapplied discretion on other issues, as in Richards. There is a relative dearth of cases where the AD reverses a Judge's decision not to recuse, unless there is an obvious conflict, which there rarely is in such cases. IMO

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585



  • 15.  RE: RECUSE

    Posted 11-20-2015 08:32 AM

    Mates,

    Thanks for all the responses.  I have very good facts for a recusal.  If anyone is interested, send me a private message and I'll let you know. [email protected]

    ------------------------------
    Andrew Bestafka Esq.
    Freehold NJ
    (732)955-2050