NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-06-2014 05:44 PM
    Collaborative Divorce Bill Cleared by Committee, Heads to Full N.J. Senate

     

    Michael Booth, New Jersey Law Journal

    New Jersey is moving closer to a method of divorce fashioned in meeting rooms rather than courtrooms.

    A bill passed unanimously by the state Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee on Thursday would allow divorcing spouses to hire legal counsel trained in collaborative practices to resolve their cases less litigiously and so less expensively.

    Couples could have a marriage dissolved without court intervention through a process similar to mediation, in which both sides would be required to provide "timely, full and candid disclosure" of relevant information, such as finances, without either side having to resort to discovery.

    The Family Collaborative Law Act, S-1224, now goes to the full Senate. If it is enacted, New Jersey would join eight other states-Alabama, Florida, Hawaii, Nevada, Ohio, Texas, Utah and Washington-as well as the District of Columbia that allow such a process.

    The bill is modeled on a 2013 proposal by the New Jersey Law Revision Commission and the national Uniform Law Commission.

    Communication between parties and their lawyers would remain confidential, as would communication between parties and certain other professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists.

    If the process proves to be unsuccessful, the collaborative lawyers would have to withdraw from the case and both parties would retain new counsel, which could not be lawyers from the collaborative lawyers' firms.

    The collaborative law process would end if one party gives notice for any reason, either party files a document that initiates a court proceeding without first obtaining the permission of the other party, either party is subject to or obtains a temporary or final restraining order under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, either party files a motion for emergent relief, a party fails to provide information necessary to resolve the dispute or if the collaborative lawyer withdraws from the proceedings.

    The bill, which already has been passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, is co-sponsored by that committee's chairman, Sen. Nicholas Scutari, D-Union, and by Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Bergen.

    An identical version, A-1477, is pending before the Assembly Human Services Committee.

    Contact the reporter at [email protected].




    -------------------------------------------
    Hanan Isaacs Esq.
    Kingston NJ
    (609)683-7400
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-06-2014 06:13 PM
    Hanan:

    Cases will pour in at a rate even greater than now. Good luck.

    Christopher R. Barbrack, Esq.
    Counselor at Law
    Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist (NJ Lic. No. 1293)
    20 Nassau Street  Suite 100
    Princeton, New Jersey 08540
    Phone: 609-497-1111

    The information contained in this electronic message may contain confidential information that is attorney work-product or is subject to the attorney-client privilege and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy,disclose or utilize this communication in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to this e-mail, stating you received this e-mail in error, and then delete the e-mail and any attachments from your system. Your cooperation is appreciated.



    On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Hanan Isaacs via New Jersey State Bar Association






  • 3.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-06-2014 07:14 PM
    [Non-text portion of this message removed]

    Chris,

     

    I sense your skepticism here.

     

    The collaborative law bills, if passed and signed into law, will represent an important legal development in New Jersey, even if collaborative law practice is not a booming part of your practice or mine.  Why?

     

    By analogy:  This office does not get many requests for palimony or prenuptial agreement advice or representation, but when they occur, we have to consider and satisfy the relevant statutes. 

     

    Failure to observe the statutes represents a deviation from expected standards and will get practitioners in trouble.

     

    Hanan

     

     

    NJSBA | Communities | All Discussions | All Discussions | Family Law

    RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

     

    You are subscribed to "Family Law" as [email protected]. To change your subscriptions, go to My Subscriptions. To unsubscribe from this community discussion, go to Unsubscribe.

    [Non-text portion of this message removed]







  • 4.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 11:59 AM

    Does this Bill also remove the need to ultimately put through any agreement through the existing adversarial process: by one part filing a complaint and the other filing a responsive pleading of some type (appearance or answer/answer counterclaim) by providing some type of joint pleading to be filed?

     

    If not (and in my cursory review of the bill, I did not see another method provided), then we should ask Scutari to include something of that nature.

     

    Jill

     

    Law Offices of Jill Anne LaZare, LLC
    382 Springfield Avenue

    Suite 312
    Summit, NJ 07901

    (908) 219 - 4366 Direct
    (908) 219 - 4362 (Fax)


    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
    The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments is privileged and confidential information, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or telephone at 908-219-4366 and delete this message. Thank you.

    Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the Law Offices of Jill Anne LaZare, LLC for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.







  • 5.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 12:46 PM
    at the conclusion of the collaborative process one of the parties will file a no fault commplaint for divorce to dissolve the marriage in an uncontested fashion. 


    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone





  • 6.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 01:11 PM
    Doesn't seem any different that making an agreement during mediation, and then proceeding with an uncontested divorce.
     
    Carol A. Weil, RN, JD
    Attorney at Law
    1405 Chews Landing Rd., Ste. 8
    Laurel Springs, NJ 08021
    (856) 352-0050
    Fax: (856) 352-0276
     
     





  • 7.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 01:32 PM
    The conclusion may be the same when an agreement is reached in either process. However the steps are different. Collaborative practice is a team approach based on a pledge by the couple not to litigate and the statute will protect the neutrals who assist the couple by extending privilege to them mirroring the same protection of the UMA. 

    Anna-Maria Pittella
    Sent from my iPhone





  • 8.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 07:36 PM
    Mediation ia not for every couple.  There are couples with power imbalances and those with very different knowledge of the parties' finances. There are spouses who are intimidated by the other spouse and who are not comfortable mediating without his or her attorney present.  The collaborative process is a good option in those cases. Further, the injection of a divorce coach in the process can make a world of difference in the outcome,  the quality of the agreement, and the relationship of the parties after the divorce is final.


    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone





  • 9.  RE: Collaborative Law Bills Advance in NJ Legi

    Posted 06-07-2014 08:07 PM
    [Non-text portion of this message removed]

    I completely agree with Gary's observations.

    As a longtime mediator and also a party representative variously in mediation, arbitration, collaborative law practice, and litigation:  each of these processes has a time and a place. Some of these processes can be combined.

    The goal is to reach the best possible outcome for parties in the most efficient and cost effective manner.

    Collaborative law practice uses good communication tools that also underpin mediation and basic good negotiation practice.  It works well with mediation and arbitration, if people reach impasse.

    As my ICLE course on ADR for family lawyers and mediators was titled, several years ago, "It Takes a Village to Get These People Divorced".  I stand by that assertion.

    Hanan

    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone


    ---

    Hanan M. Isaacs, Esq.

    [Non-text portion of this message removed]

    Hanan M. Isaacs, P.C.
    4499 Route 27, Kingston, NJ
    t 609.683.7400
    f 609.921.8982
    vCard: Download here >>
    [email protected]
    www.hananisaacs.com

    [Non-text portion of this message removed][Non-text portion of this message removed][Non-text portion of this message removed]
    [Non-text portion of this message removed]

    Compassionate counsel; tough advocacy.







Global message icon