the Court will get the arb decision, but need not get the record presented to the arbitrators, I do not think.
perhaps agree on limiting what will be presented to the Court, what the 'record' will be that the Court recieves in deciding the disputed issues?
Please send me an email to confirm that you received this email and that you can read it. Thank you!
Sent on behalf of:
Robert F. Davies, Esq.
The Davies Law Firm, P.A.
45 Essex Street, Suite 3 West
Hackensack New Jersey 07601
Phone: 201-820-3459
Fax: 201-820-3461
Email: [email protected]
Website: AttorneyRobertDavies.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email and any accompanying attachments contains information which
may be confidential and privileged. If you are not the addressee (or
authorized to receive this message for the addressee), you are not
authorized to read, use, copy or disclose this message or any part of it
to anyone. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
Thank you.
Original Message------
Case was tried via arbitration several years ago as there were massive Sheridan issues. The arbitrators indeed found tax evasion on a very large scale and that both parties were involved.
Now, several years postjudgment, if the complete arbitration decision is filed / included with a postjudgment motion that's about to be filed, does the court have a duty under Sheridan to report it? The court wouldn't be viewing the evidence and testimony and making findings, it would simply be viewing an arb decision -- I think that would be a key distinction.
Or should it perhaps be redacted (blacking out incriminating sections)... or would this negate the whole point of including it?
------------------------------
_______________________
David Perry Davis, Esq.
112 West Franklin Avenue
Pennington, NJ 08534
www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
Voice: 609-737-2222
Fax: 609-737-3222
_______________________
------------------------------