NJSBA Family Law Section

Good afternoon, all;
Can someone direct me to the case that stands for the proposition that PL cohabitation can prevent an award of alimony, PL or otherwise?

Thanks-
Sandy

-------------------------------------------
T. Sandberg Durst Esq.
Princeton NJ
(609)436-9079

-------------------------------------------

Hello.  Rose v. Csapo, 359 N.J. Super. 53,61 (Ch. Div. 2002)-------------------------------------------

Lisa Harvey Esq.
Matawan NJ
(908)578-3250

-------------------------------------------






Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2013 13:25
From: T. Sandberg Durst
Subject: Pendente lite cohabitation negates alimony

Good afternoon, all;
Can someone direct me to the case that stands for the proposition that PL cohabitation can prevent an award of alimony, PL or otherwise?

Thanks-
Sandy

-------------------------------------------
T. Sandberg Durst Esq.
Princeton NJ
(609)436-9079

-------------------------------------------

Didn't see Lisa's post. Also, my cite is wrong - it's a Chancery Division case, as Lisa mentioned, not an Appellate Division case as I incorrectly cited.

-------------------------------------------
Gregory Thomlison Esq.
Toms River NJ
(732)736-8100

-------------------------------------------






Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2013 13:33
From: Lisa Harvey
Subject: Pendente lite cohabitation negates alimony


Hello.  Rose v. Csapo, 359 N.J. Super. 53,61 (Ch. Div. 2002)-------------------------------------------

Lisa Harvey Esq.
Matawan NJ
(908)578-3250

-------------------------------------------






Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2013 13:25
From: T. Sandberg Durst
Subject: Pendente lite cohabitation negates alimony

Good afternoon, all;
Can someone direct me to the case that stands for the proposition that PL cohabitation can prevent an award of alimony, PL or otherwise?

Thanks-
Sandy

-------------------------------------------
T. Sandberg Durst Esq.
Princeton NJ
(609)436-9079

-------------------------------------------

I believe it's Rose v. Csapo, 359 N.J. Super. 53 (App. Div. 2002)

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5732515355778388304&q=rose+v+csapo&hl=en&as_sdt=4,31

-------------------------------------------
Gregory Thomlison Esq.
Toms River NJ
(732)736-8100

-------------------------------------------






Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2013 13:25
From: T. Sandberg Durst
Subject: Pendente lite cohabitation negates alimony

Good afternoon, all;
Can someone direct me to the case that stands for the proposition that PL cohabitation can prevent an award of alimony, PL or otherwise?

Thanks-
Sandy

-------------------------------------------
T. Sandberg Durst Esq.
Princeton NJ
(609)436-9079

-------------------------------------------

Sandy -

And review the cases that cite to it.  Rose v. Csapo is trial level, but it is cited by appellate cases:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=5732515355778388304&q=rose+csapo&hl=en&as_sdt=4,31


-------------------------------------------
- Dave

David Perry Davis, Esq.
112 West Franklin Avenue
Pennington, NJ 08534
Voice: 609-737-2222
Fax: 609-737-3222
-------------------------------------------