NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  Out of State move concessions to ensure dad brings children back for PT

    Posted 02-08-2016 01:32 PM

    Dear list mates:

    Client is struggling financially in New Jersey as he has 6 children and paying an exorbitant rental expense for his home.  Has found a comparable job in South Hampton, Pennsylvania but his rental expense will be significantly less on the other side of the Delaware.  Adversary is looking for some protections with teeth to ensure that the children are brought back to New Jersey for mom’s parenting time since she is possibly consenting to this move without a Baures Hearing.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated and because my adversary is probably joining us on the list serve, he and I can then formulate a Consent Order based on suggested concessions.  TIA

    Best,

    Eric

    ------------------------------
    Eric Hannum Esq.
    Jackson NJ
    (732)370-9596
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Out of State move concessions to ensure dad brings children back for PT

    Posted 02-08-2016 01:44 PM

    You might consider adding a provision that your client agrees to pay reasonable counsel fees for any breach in parenting time that requires an enforcement proceeding.  Should give some motivation to make sure the parenting time for the parent making the concession is followed. 

     

    Albertina Webb, Esq.

    image001.png@01D092DC.1649CC60

    100 Willow Brook Road * Suite 100 * Freehold * New Jersey * 07728

    680 Hooper Avenue * Building A * Suite 101 * Toms River * NJ  * 08753

    115 Maple Avenue * Red Bank * New Jersey * 07701    

    (732) 410-2308 (direct)        (732) 462-7170 (main)        (732) 780-9723 (fax)

    www.demlplaw.com

    "Divorce Law Group"*

     

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are intended for the exclusive view and use of the addressee. The information contained herein may be privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure by applicable laws, rules or regulations.  If you have received this email in error and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby placed on notice that any use, distribution, copying or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error please notify the sender immediately at 732 462 7170 and immediately delete this email and any attachments.  Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. *Managing Shareholder James A. Paone, Esq.

     

    IRS Circular 230 disclosure:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

     






  • 3.  RE: Out of State move concessions to ensure dad brings children back for PT

    Posted 02-08-2016 02:52 PM
    Hi Eric and Adversary:

    You can enter into a consent order fixing custody and parenting time that confirms she will bring the children back to NJ for parenting time.  I would be as specific as possible about the exchange location, times for the exchange, specific parenting time, vacation time, and any consequences for non-production of the children, etc.  Your e-mail suggests that he is the parent of the primary residence, so remember that after 6 months, PA likely becomes the children's home state.  Then you might be dealing with PA law. I would highly recommend mediating these issues. It can be done.  Good luck.

    Roz

    Rosalyn A. Metzger LLC
    Attorney-Mediator
    P. O. Box 5104
    One Leigh Street
    Clinton, New Jersey 08809
    (908) 238-0099
    www.mediate.com/rmetzger

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail contains information that is privileged and confidential and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use.  You are prohibited from copying, distributing, or otherwise using this information if you are not the intended recipient.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments from your system.





  • 4.  RE: Out of State move concessions to ensure dad brings children back for PT

    Posted 02-08-2016 03:20 PM

    See Craft v. Bugbee

     

    In Craft v. Bugbee a couple with two teenaged children negotiated an agreement concerning their parenting time with the children as part of their divorce.(PTA). The agreement allowed the mother to move to California with the children but it provided that New Jersey would retain jurisdiction over all custody and parenting time issues that would arise in the future. The father continued to reside in New Jersey.

    In the years since they signed the agreement, the mother filed numerous motions to try to undo this specific provision of the parenting agreement, but the courts always denied her applications.

    Two years ago, the mother filed another motion, again arguing that the New Jersey court should decline jurisdiction on the ground that it is an inconvenient forum jurisdiction and that jurisdiction should be moved to California as a more appropriate forum." Her motion was denied.
    This jurisdiction issue, the trial judge said, was "specifically contemplated" when the parties negotiated the agreement. The father's consent to the mother's relocation with his sons to the other side of the country was contingent upon the inclusion of this provision. In denying the mother's motion, the judge used the standards established under New Jersey's Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), N.J.S.A. 2A:34-71.

    Again, in September 2014, the mother made the same motion (she was certainly persistent!). The same judge came stuck to his prior ruling. He expressed concern that if he disregarded the agreement they had made, this may be the beginning of a slippery slope – future divorcing litigants might "merely feign agreement at the outset, with the intention of later returning to court to challenge its validity."

    The New Jersey Appellate Division upheld the Family Part judge's ruling. The lesson to be learned is that when you make a deal, expect the courts to enforce it, absent a showing that enforcement was not in the childrens' best interests.

     

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .