NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  Obligation for insurance death benefit to estate

    Posted 09-28-2017 12:14 PM
    ​​All,
    I have a question regarding the right of the child to put lien against father's estate due to father's failure to maintain life insurance naming the child as beneficiary.

    Facts: The father died about five years ago but the child is still un-emancipated- attending college.  At the time of the father's death, there was no life insurance policy in place despite the MSA obligation.  The father's estate is now due a very large inheritance.  Does the child have standing to go after the father's estate for the benefit he should have received if the father had complied with the MSA and had said life insurance naming the child?
    Does anyone know of case law on the issue?

    Thanks in advance,
    Marcia


    ------------------------------
    Marcia Leach Esq.
    Strich Law Firm, P.C.
    Cranbury NJ
    (609)924-2900
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Obligation for insurance death benefit to estate

    Posted 09-28-2017 12:17 PM

    yes.  you file in General Equity by OSC against the Estate for the life insurance amount under the MSA.

     

    Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.

    Law Office of Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.

    82 Speedwell Avenue, 2nd Floor

    Morristown, NJ 07960

    Telephone No. (973) 538-7070

    Fax No. (973) 538-7088

    Email: [email protected]

     

    ***EMAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** The information contained in this electronic message may contain attorney-client privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the owner of the email address listed as the recipient of this message.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email message, you are hereby notified that any disclosure dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, plesae notify the sender by return email, and by telephone at (973) 538-7070.

     






  • 3.  RE: Obligation for insurance death benefit to estate

    Posted 09-28-2017 12:35 PM

    Marcia:

     

    See Flanigan v. Munson, 175 N.J. 597 (2003) in reaching its holding.  Flanigan involved a property settlement agreement under which the divorcing wife and husband agreed to name their unemancipated children as beneficiaries of any life insurance policies either of them had through their employment.  The wife obtained two employment related policies but listed no beneficiaries for those policies.  She died.  The court held that a constructive trust was properly imposed on the proceeds of the policy in favor of the children of the marriage.  In so holding, the court stated that once a life insurance obligation was incorporated into a final judgment of divorce, the obligor "could not have modified it unilaterally without applying to the trial court". Flanigan, 175 N.J. at 607.

     

    In your case, since there was no policy, you would sue the state for the value of the life insurance that should have been maintained, plus interest. You may also want to look at the decision in Kiken v. Kiken.

     

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]

     

    Visit my personal website:  www.mydivorcelawyernj.com

    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association,  Monmouth Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

                                      

     

    IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with certain regulations promulgated by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein, unless expressly stated otherwise.

    This E-Mail message and any documents accompanying this E-Mail transmission contain information from the law firm of Drescher & Cheslow, P.A. which is "Privileged and confidential attorney-client communication and/or work product of counsel." If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution and/or the taking of or refraining from taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this E-Mail information is strictly prohibited and may result in legal action being instituted against you. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission and delete the message and any accompanying documents from your system immediately. Thank you