NJSBA Family Law Section

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

Hi Christine.

I had similar qualms about doing a Zoom FRO hearing.

I was defending.

I decided it was more important to my client to remove the overhead cloud than to wait for a physical court return that will take months.

We tried the case today.  We pre-entered the evidence, per court administrator requirements.

The Judge was very reasonable with both sides.

The experience was pretty good.

I would do it again.

Hanan

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

I am representing the husband in a high income divorce. The parties earn well over $187,200 per year; the wife earns $155,00 per year gross and the husband earns approximately $286,000 gross inclusive of commissions and bonuses.  They have three children ages 15, 12, and 7.  The judge set temporary child support at $1500/week which I felt was somewhat high (I did not represent the husband at that time).  I really need help in determining what a reasonable child support obligation would be.  I would appreciate all guidance and input.

Thanks,

Lisa Davenport | Attorney

___________________________________

Kim & Bae Building

2160 North Central Road, Suite 303,  Fort Lee, NJ 07024
T (201) 585-2288 Ext: 103    |    F (201) 585-2246

[email protected]  | www.KimBae.Com

45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2000, New York, NY 10111

T (212) 319-6888

FRAUD ALERT: This office will never Email Wiring Instructions to you. If you receive Wiring Instructions from this, or any other email address on your transaction, please call this office immediately to discuss.  Never trust requests to wire or transfer money sent via email from our office. Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions. These emails are convincing and sophisticated. Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via a telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number. Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. You will never be instructed to wire money related to a closing without verbal confirmation.

This message is attorney privileged and confidential information and is transmitted for the exclusive information and use of the addressee. Please notify the sender by email if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful.　 Please note that this law firm does not accept time sensitive or action-oriented messages via email. We further reserve the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this email address.
Messages sent to or from this email address may be stored on the law firm email system.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

I am representing the husband in a high income divorce. The parties earn well over $187,200 per year; the wife earns $155,00 per year gross and the husband earns approximately $286,000 gross inclusive of commissions and bonuses.  They have three children ages 15, 12, and 7.  The judge set temporary child support at $1500/week which I felt was somewhat high (I did not represent the husband at that time).  I really need help in determining what a reasonable child support obligation would be.  I would appreciate all guidance and input.

Thanks,

Lisa Davenport | Attorney

___________________________________

Kim & Bae Building

2160 North Central Road, Suite 303,  Fort Lee, NJ 07024
T (201) 585-2288 Ext: 103    |    F (201) 585-2246

[email protected]  | www.KimBae.Com

45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2000, New York, NY 10111

T (212) 319-6888

FRAUD ALERT: This office will never Email Wiring Instructions to you. If you receive Wiring Instructions from this, or any other email address on your transaction, please call this office immediately to discuss.  Never trust requests to wire or transfer money sent via email from our office. Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions. These emails are convincing and sophisticated. Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via a telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number. Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. You will never be instructed to wire money related to a closing without verbal confirmation.

This message is attorney privileged and confidential information and is transmitted for the exclusive information and use of the addressee. Please notify the sender by email if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful.　 Please note that this law firm does not accept time sensitive or action-oriented messages via email. We further reserve the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this email address.
Messages sent to or from this email address may be stored on the law firm email system.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.

Hello everyone, I have an FRO hearing scheduled to proceed via ZOOM. During a conference with the judge earlier today, I advised him that my client is objecting to proceeding to trial via Zoom. The judge explained that unless I have the consent of my adversary, which I do not, I need to file an application showing good cause showing why under the circumstances it is not appropriate for the hearing to be conducted via Zoom. In this case, there are lot of text messages and audio/video footage from the Plaintiff's phone which will raise obvious authentication issues since we cannot verify the veracity of the texts, etc., without being able to physically examine the phone.

I am wondering whether anyone has filed such an application and if you have prevailed, what other arguments have you raised?

Thank you  and stay safe!

Christine Dolan
Senior Litigation Attorney
Cordell & Cordell - Mt. Laurel
701 East Gate Drive, Suite 310, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Direct (856) 291-5802 | Mobile (856) 899-9258 | Fax (856) 295-7019
Email [email protected]

CordellCordell.com | DadsDivorce.com | MensDivorce.com | MensRights.com



Please consider the environment before printing

Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please call Cordell & Cordell, P.C. at 1-866DADSLAW and destroy the original message and all copies. Be advised that transmitting information by email has a number of risks that you should consider before using email. Email is not necessarily secure and therefore may not be confidential. There are many risks associated with communication via email. Email can be circulated, forwarded, stored electronically and on paper, and broadcast to unintended recipients. Furthermore, there is a risk that someone specifically interested in the matter could intercept the message. If you no longer wish to receive communications via email please advise our offices.