NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only

Notice of Appearance

  • 1.  Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 04:07 PM

    I don't know if this has been posted before, but I have just been informed by Middlesex County intake, that we must file a Notice of Appearance every time we file a Motion/Cross Motion or FD, if we are new to the case, i.e. not the attorney of record in their system.  It requires a separate form, similar to a Substitution of Attorney I presume. There is a $50 fee, and this fee is in addition to the $50 it costs to file the application in the first place.  I don't know if other counties are doing this as well but it is now a thing in Middlesex.  If you don't send your Notice of Appearance and $50 check, the entire Motion will be returned to you.   

    ------------------------------
    Ann Fabrikant, Esq.
    East Brunswick, NJ
    (732) 659-4109
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 04:14 PM
    My understanding, after discussing this issue at the Family Law Committee meeting in Ocean County, is that you are not required to file/pay a Notice of Appearance and file/pay a Notice of Motion (it is one or the other).  They are not supposed to charge you for both.  If your client filed pro se, then you would file/pay the Notice of Appearance.


    Gregory Thomlison, Esq.
    Kerr & Thomlison, L.L.C.
    650 Washington St.
    Suite 1C
    Toms River, NJ 08753
    Ph. (732) 736-8100

    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS ATTORNEY-PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, Please immediately notify us by telephone or reply to this email.  Thank you.





  • 3.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 04:53 PM
    This is really over the top. Whether the issue is the FD form or a fee or something else, they really should reach to counsel and give us a couple of days. I had a complaint returned to me because case management couldn't determine the gender of the parties and the filing date, for irrelevant reasons, became a big deal. Evenutally the judge accepted the original date, but... this is nonsense.

    I use a collateral account, so they just charge it -- I'd suggest that course of action for all. Google it or check the judiciary website if you don't have one.


    <x-sigsep>

    Please confirm that you received this email and referenced attachments (if any).

    - Dave

    David Perry Davis, Esq.
    ----------------------------------------------------
       www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
    ----------------------------------------------------
    112 West Franklin Avenue
    Pennington, NJ 08534
    Voice: 609-737-2222
    Fax:    609-737-3222

    </x-sigsep>





  • 4.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 04:55 PM

    David, I used my collateral account, and they still returned it to me, most likely because I didn't submit a Notice of Appearance.

    ------------------------------
    Ann Fabrikant, Esq.
    East Brunswick, NJ
    (732) 659-4109



  • 5.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 06:21 PM

    David:

     

    On my case, I got a call and she said she would hold my cross-motion until I faxed her a notice of appearance with authorization to charge my firm's collateral account the $50.00.

     

    It was not her fault- she was the messenger.

     

    I have spoken with our PJ in Middlesex but no answer as yet from AOC who I believe has been asked.

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .

     






  • 6.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 07:53 AM

    Bob,

     

    I had this same issue in Middlesex County recently, but the facts are even more egregious.  Pro se defendant files an Answer and Counterclaim in his divorce, then hires our firm.  We immediately file a Substitution of Attorney.  Then, adversary files motion, so we have to file a cross motion.  Before filing the cross motion, we participate in a Case Management Conference and an Order is entered

     

    Despite our filing a Substitution of Attorney – and paying a fee – and participating as counsel of record in the CMC, we were told they would not file our cross motion without a Notice of Appearance being filed!

     

    So in this scenario, there are three fees – SOA, cross motion and appearance.

     

    In a case with a marital estate replete with debt, too little income to go around, one disabled party, and attorneys being paid by relatives tipping into their retirement savings.  It's an outrage.

     

    Allison C. Williams, Esq.

    http://www.nblsc.us/site/content/images/pics/njsc105x105.gifimage002.png@01D01E95.C053C460  
    http://www.aaml.org/sites/all/themes/AAML2012/logo.png

    Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Law Attorney

    Certified Family Law Trial Attorney, National Board of Trial Advocacy

    Fellow, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers


    The Williams Law group, LLC
    1945 Morris Avenue, 2nd Floor
    Union, New Jersey 07083
    Ph: (908) 810-1083
    Fx: (908) 810-1087

    http://newjerseydyfsdefense.com

    [email protected]

    ***THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE.***

     






  • 7.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 11:17 AM

    Allison:

     

    That's FUBAR!!!!

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .

     






  • 8.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-03-2016 06:09 PM

    Ann:

     

    Yes, I posted about this last week after I received a call from Middlesex County.

     

    Here is my position:

     

    It has come to our attention that in certain counties, the Family Part is requiring the filing of a "Notice of Appearance" and an accompanying $50.00 filing fee in the following situation. There is a Judgment of Divorce between parties that occurred some years ago. There have been no intervening motions filed post-judgment. Then, one of the parties files a Pro Se Notice of Motion seeking certain relief. The other party retains an attorney and files opposition and a cross-motion for relief. Obviously, there is no need for the attorney to file a Substitution of Attorney as there is no attorney of record under this scenario, yet the party filing the cross-motion has been compelled to pay two fees totaling $100.00 ($50.00 for the cross-motion and $50.00 for the "Notice of Appearance" while the Pro Se party that filed the motion pays only $50.00. If this is the policy of the Court, it dissuades litigants from seeking representation by an attorney and amounts to a penalty for any litigant who retains an attorney. We do not believe that this is appropriate nor was it the intention of the recent filing fee changes promulgated in late 2014. Accordingly, we ask that this matter also be clarified and that the various county Family Division managers be instructed that neither this fee nor the filing fee for an answer to counterclaim, as set forth above, be charged.

     

    I think the NJSBA needs to get this and the ridiculous "answer to counterclaim" fee revoked.

     

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .

     






  • 9.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 03:05 PM

     

    Once again there seems to be confusion on the filing procedure. Can someone please take a moment to assist me- I have been retained to file a cross motion in a post judgment FM case. With consent of my adversary I requested an adjournment specifically referencing the need to file a cross motion. I have just been advised that the matter can be adjourned and that I must file a notice of appearance. Is this correct? I thought that the filing of the cross motion would serve as my appearance- no?






  • 10.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 03:07 PM
    Nope, new rule which adds a 50 dollar filing fee.  If someone was pro se and they later retain you, you need to file a Notice of Appearance and pay 50.






  • 11.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 04:41 PM

    Frank:

     

    If that is so (and Middlesex is insisting it is, although I strongly disagree), then they are punishing the litigant for hiring an attorney, because now the litigant is being charged $50 while if the litigant is pro see, he or she is only being charged $50.00 for the motion or cross-motion filing fee.

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .

     






  • 12.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 05:01 PM
    The wording on the Notice to the Bar provided by the Court when the Rule went into effect is confusing.  It would appear that the purpose of the Notice of Appearance is to relax R.1:11-2 and permit a Notice of Appearance (at a slightly higher fee) to be submitted instead of a Substitution of Attorney when a pro se litigant hires an attorney mid-litigation.  However, in the same Notice to the Bar, it states that a Notice of Appearance is required for the first appearance in a case by an attorney on any submissions other than the initial filing (i.e. Complaint or Answer or first appearance); consequently, it would appear that where a party hires new counsel for a post-judgment filing, a Notice of Appearance is required.  Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the first time a rule has been (mis)construed to generate fees (harking back to our recent discourse regarding the filing fee now being imposed for filing an Answer to Counterclaim).


    Very truly yours,  

    NANCY B. MARCHIONI
    241 Cook Avenue
    Middlesex, NJ  08846
    Telephone (732) 667-3668
    Facsimile (732) 667-3669
    Cellular (908) 917-1493
    EMAIL: [email protected]
     
    Treasury Regulations require us to inform you that any Federal
    tax advice contained in this communication is not intended and
    cannot be used for the purpose of: (i) avoiding tax related
    penalties under United States law; or (ii) promoting,
    marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or
    matter addressed herein. The contents of this e-mail may be
    protected, by the attorney-client privilege or may otherwise be
    privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended
    recipient, any further disclosure or use, dissemination,
    distribution, printing or copying of this e-mail or any
    attachment hereto, is prohibited. If you have received
    this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately so that we may
    correct our internal records, and then delete the original e-
    mail.
    All e-mail sent to or from the Law Firm of Nancy B. Marchioni is
    subject to monitoring by its members. Unauthorized interception
    of this e-mail is a violation of Federal and New Jersey State Laws.
    IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This email is not offered nor intended as, nor should it be construed as,
    the offer of legal advice nor presentation nor statement of applicable law nor rules applicable to any
    claims that the recipient of this email may presently have or may have had.  






  • 13.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 05:02 PM

    it is more than that.  The court rules say representation ends 45 days from order or judgment. so post-judgment, new attorneys on different applications.  No Substitution should be require if it is a New Post-J application.  The Motion and Cross-Motion ($50 filing fee) IS the notice of appearance for the new attorney.  There is no statutory or court rule basis for requiring a Notice of Appearance with fee and Cross-Motion with fee.

     

    Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.

    82 Speedwell Avenue

    Morristown, New Jersey 07960

    973-538-7070

    973-538-7088 Fax

    [email protected]

     






  • 14.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-04-2016 05:09 PM

    I meant to say your client is being charged $100 in filing fees while the pro se litigant is only being charged $50.

     

     

     

    Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
    Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.

    610 Bridge Plaza Drive

    Manalapan, NJ 07726

    (732) 972-1600
    Fax (732) 972-0038
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Member, Middlesex County Bar Association, New Jersey Association for Justice and New Jersey State Bar Association

         

     

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

    Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you
    .

     






  • 15.  RE: Notice of Appearance

    Posted 02-05-2016 09:11 AM

    Well, in Ocean County, they have made me file a Notice of Appearance to request an adjournment (almost every single time since the rules went into effect) and to pay the $50 NOA filing fee, even though I will be later filing a cross-motion.  It's ridiculous.  

    ------------------------------
    Rachel Cotrino Esq.
    Jackson NJ
    (732)987-9966