NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2015 01:49 PM
     
    I am writing a brief on the non-dischargability of equitable distribution debts that were allocated in a divorce. I am not finding any recent cases and was wondering if anyone knew of anything recent. The debtor filed a chapter 7.   If  so, it would be greatly appreciated.
     
    Thanks,
    Gerri Duswalt


    GERALDENE SHERR DUSWALT

    ATTORNEY AT LAW
    QUALIFIED MEDIATOR

    Admitted in New York and New Jersey

    1812 Front Street
    Scotch Plains, New Jersey 07076

    1133 Broadway, Suite 708
    New York, N.Y. 10010

    Telephone: (908) 322-5160
    Facsimile: (908) 654-3970
    E-mail: [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Web Site: www.duswaltlawfirm.com


    General practice of law serving the legal needs of the community; family and matrimonial law, bankruptcy, debtor/creditor, consumer, municipal court, real estate, wills, civil litigation.



    This e-mail and any documents accompanying this e-mail may contain information from the law office of Geraldene Sherr Duswalt, Esq. that is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named in this e-mail transmission and which may be confidential, privileged or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender at once.


  • 2.  RE: (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2015 02:00 PM

    I believe it is in the bankruptcy code itself.  check with a bankruptcy attorney.

     

    Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.

    82 Speedwell Avenue

    Morristown, New Jersey 07960

    973-538-7070

    973-538-7088 Fax

    [email protected]

     






  • 3.  RE: (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2015 02:26 PM

    Correct. 

     

     

    Noel S. Tonneman, Esq.

     

    THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED.  IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AT 732-696-2500 AND DELETE THIS EMAIL. 

     

    YOUR EMAIL IS IMPORTANT TO ME.  HOWEVER, I AM NOT ALWAYS ABLE TO ANSWER EMAILS ON THE DAY THEY ARE RECEIVED.  IF YOUR MATTER IS TIME SENSITIVE, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE AT 732-696-2500 AND SPEAK WITH MY STAFF DIRECTLY.  THANK YOU.

     






  • 4.  RE: (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2015 02:23 PM


    Hi Geraldene:

    Unless the law has changed since 2007 when I briefed this issue in a case, marital or equitable distribution debts are normally dischargeable unless it can be shown that they constituted  “alimony, maintenance, or support."

    Below is cut n paste from my letter brief to the Court (where I represented the party who had filed bankruptcy after a divorce)...

    In the event of an individual’s bankruptcy subsequent to a divorce and property settlement agreement, it is federal law that governs whether a matrimonial obligation is exempt from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).  E.g., Larbig v. Larbig, 384 N.J. Super 17, 26 (App. Div. 2006); Davis v. Davis, 2005 WL 3299348 at *2 (N.J. Super., App. Div. 2005).  Furthermore, it is the party who objects to the discharge of a particular debt has the burden of proving nondischargeability.  In re Gianakas, 917 F.2d 759, 761 (3rd Cir. 1990) (citing Bankruptcy Rule 4005; Matter of Long, 794 F.2d 928, 930 (4th Cir. 1986); In re Klippinger, 27 B.R. 530, 531 (Bankr.M.D.Pa. 1982)).

    Under the Bankruptcy Code, a general discharge obtained by a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) pursuant to filing a Chapter 7 petition “discharges the debtor from all debts that arose before the date of the order for relief.”  However, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) sets forth the debts that are exempted from discharge, including in that list any debt “for a domestic support obligation.”  11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5). 

    In order to avoid the debt being discharged, the creditor (here, Eileen Lazarus) must persuade the Court that the obligation in question actually constituted “alimony, maintenance, or support.”  Davis, supra, at *1 (quoting In re Gianakas, supra, at 761-762).   As the Legislative Statements for 11 U.S.C. § 523 clearly explains:

    Section (a)(5) “excepts from discharge a debt owed to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor, in connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree, or property settlement agreement, for alimony to, maintenance for, or support of such spouse of child, but not to the extent that the debt is assigned to another entityIf the debtor has assumed an obligation of the debtor’s spouse to a third party in connection with the separation agreement, property settlement agreement, or divorce proceeding, such debt is dischargeable to the extent that payment of the debt is not actually in the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support of the debtor’s spouse, former spouse, or child.” (Emphasis added).

    This factual determination with respect to dischargeability of the marital obligation “depends on a finding as to the intent of the parties at the time of the settlement agreement.”  In re Giankas, supra, at 762.  Federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over such a dispute.  Davis, supra, at *1.

    The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit described the manner of ascertaining the intent of the parties, in this setting, in the following way:

    “First, the Court must examine the language and substance of the agreement in the context of surrounding circumstances, using extrinsic evidence if necessary.... Because the language of the agreement alone may not provide a sufficiently conclusive answer as to the nature of an obligation, the second indicator to which we must look to assist in ascertaining the parties' intent is the parties' financial circum-stances at the time of the settlement.... Third, the Court should examine the function served by the obligation at the time of the divorce or settlement.”

    In re Giankas, supra, at 762-763.

    ------------------------------
    Blake Rush Esq.
    Easton PA
    (610)258-4003



  • 5.  RE: (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2015 02:56 PM
    Additionally, attorney fee awards related to alimony, maintenance and support are not dischargeable.

    Shelley J. Pedersen, Esq.

    Sent from my iPhone





  • 6.  RE: (no subject)

    Posted 10-29-2015 12:42 PM

    I had a similar issue a while back - here's a good website that addresses it. The firm is in Illinois, but BK law is obviously federal. I know there were changes to what constitutes a nondischargeable Domestic Support Obligation that affected dischargeability of e.d. to some degree. Just be sure the cases you're citing take that into account.

    Chapter 7 Bankruptcy | Chapter 13 Bankruptcy | Bankruptcy Lawyer | Bankruptcy Attorney | Oak Brook, IL Attorney | Attorney Robert Schaller

    ------------------------------
    _______________________

    David Perry Davis, Esq.
    112 West Franklin Avenue
    Pennington, NJ 08534
    www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
    Voice: 609-737-2222
    Fax: 609-737-3222
    _______________________