I would NOT discuss this in opening.
I would simply ask each of them on direct exam if they are licensed attorneys in NJ in good standing.
I would state your point in CLOSING.
Keep it simple.
Less chance of drawing objections and having to explain "why".
Hanan
-------------------------------------------
Hanan Isaacs Esq.
Kingston NJ
(609)683-7400
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-29-2013 18:04
From: David Perry Davis
Subject: Lawyer as Witness - mention?
I have a trial tomorrow where my client's parents are both attorneys. This is not a "shades of grey" situation - even for Family Court, the extremes of the positions are marked. As the judge said when hearing the OSC and ordering tomorrow's hearing, "someone is lying and doing so in spades."
My client's parents are direct fact witnesses. Should I / can I / would it be wise to point out, either in opening or during direct, that "my clients as officers of the court are under a special duty of candor when testifying"?
Thoughts?
Thanks,
-------------------------------------------
David Perry Davis, Esq.
112 West Franklin Avenue
Pennington, NJ 08534
Voice: 609-737-2222
Fax: 609-737-3222
-------------------------------------------