Along with this same topic...
Is anyone aware of a case involving an adult disabled child that is receiving social security benefits? I am arguing (in part) that this would be an off-guidelines support calculation, and that the child's benefits should be considered.
The other aspect of my argument is that there should be two separate child support numbers, one for the two other children, which I believe should remain under the guidelines; and a separate number for the adult child, so that his SS benefits can be maximized... as it stand SS is taking the total child support number, dividing it in half and attributing to the adult child.
Thoughts?
-------------------------------------------
Stephanie Hunnell Esq.
Belmar NJ
(732)749-3500
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-23-2014 19:03
From: Blake Rush
Subject: Government Benefits for Child
It is required under federal law that the SSA derivative benefit be paid to the child. If Husband is not the PPR, he is not entitled to receive it.
Blake W. Rush, Esq.
Pfeiffer, Bruno, Minotti & DeEsch, P.C.
44 North 2nd Street - P.O. Box 468
Easton, PA 18044-0468
(610) 258-4003 (OFFICE)
(610) 258-1943 (FAX)
[email protected]
NOTICE: This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privilege(s). It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient(s), or you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments, without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege(s).