The filing of an appeal wouldn't change the basic tenant that post-complaint passive gain is subject to distribution. I've had cases where we included a specific dollar amount in order to protect the other spouse from possible market decline, but, absent something along those lines, the general law (Painter, Brandenburg, Orlger, etc) would control. If the App decision included a specific amount and there's ambiguity and your adversary is being ...creative... enough to argue over it, I'd consider a post-disposition motion to clarify the point? (I don't know how much App Div you do, but they like "check box" answers where possible rather than supplemental explanations, so I'd word the motion relief carefully so a "granted" will answer it).
<x-sigsep>
Please confirm that you received this email and referenced attachments (if any).
- Dave
David Perry Davis, Esq.
----------------------------------------------------
www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
----------------------------------------------------
* * Please note our new address * *
57 Hamilton Avenue -- Suite 301
Hopewell, NJ 08525
Voice: 609-466-1222
Fax: 609-466-1223
</x-sigsep>