Since you asked, my comment is "Nothing surprises me."
Robert E. Goldstein, Esq.
Drescher & Cheslow, P.A.
(732) 972-1600
[email protected]Visit my website:
www.mydivorcelawyernj.com
Original Message------
Opinions requested: What would you all think about the trial judge's former law clerk, with more or less a year of junior practice experience beyond that, sitting as 1) an ESP panelist; 2) a court-appointed mediator; 3) or Intensive Settlement Panelist on an extremely complicated custody-removal divorce that's actually in a pending nearly 2 1/2 year divorce, after the trial actually convened? What would you all think about that decision? Given that, what would you then think about a judge ordering the parties to have yet another session with that the same extremely junior, former law clerk without lawyers present, when one of the parties is a pro se attorney? I just need a sanity check here, in case I have missed something. Purely hypothetical, of course. This sounds a lot like FRONTIER JUSTICE to me. Thanks. Bob Goldstein, maybe you would like to comment, just randomly may I mind you.
------------------------------
Curtis Romanowski Esq.
Senior Attorney - Proprietor
Metuchen NJ
(732)603-8585
------------------------------