There is a good discussion in Skoloff and Cutler at Section 1.9A(3) Proceeding with a Default Case indicating that the extent of participation of the Defaulting Defendant is limited in the discretion of the Court in view of the circumstances giving rise to the Default either by a failure to answer or a failure to make discovery and a dismissal by the Court and suppression of the Pleadings as a Discovery Sanction. Please review as the section is helpful and being forewarned is being forearmed.
JJH
John J. Harper, JSC [ret.]
Of Counsel
Laufer, Dalena, Cadicina, Jensen & Bradley, LLC
23 Cattano Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
Telephone: 973 285 1444
Fax: 973 285 0271
E-Mail: [email protected]


E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND PERMANENTLY DELETE THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.