NJSBA Family Law Section

In regard to motions to terminate an alimony obligation, does anyone know the case name that stands for the proposition that a party is entitled to conduct discovery after demonstrating a prima facie showing of cohabitation. 

Specifically, I am looking for the caselaw that explains the rationale for permitting discovery as being that conclusive evidence tending to prove or disprove cohabitation is often in the sole possession of the supported spouse.

I recall reading this in legal research a few years ago, but I can't seem to find it now for a current case I am involved in.

Thanks in advance.

------------------------------
Blake W. Rush, Esq.
Law Office of Blake W. Rush
14 E. Main Street
Clinton, NJ 08809
(908) 713-9800 (PHONE)
(908) 713-9803 (FAX)
www.blakerushlaw.com
------------------------------

Original Message------

In regard to motions to terminate an alimony obligation, does anyone know the case name that stands for the proposition that a party is entitled to conduct discovery after demonstrating a prima facie showing of cohabitation. 

Specifically, I am looking for the caselaw that explains the rationale for permitting discovery as being that conclusive evidence tending to prove or disprove cohabitation is often in the sole possession of the supported spouse.

I recall reading this in legal research a few years ago, but I can't seem to find it now for a current case I am involved in.

Thanks in advance.

------------------------------
Blake W. Rush, Esq.
Law Office of Blake W. Rush
14 E. Main Street
Clinton, NJ 08809
(908) 713-9800 (PHONE)
(908) 713-9803 (FAX)
www.blakerushlaw.com
------------------------------

Original Message------

In regard to motions to terminate an alimony obligation, does anyone know the case name that stands for the proposition that a party is entitled to conduct discovery after demonstrating a prima facie showing of cohabitation. 

Specifically, I am looking for the caselaw that explains the rationale for permitting discovery as being that conclusive evidence tending to prove or disprove cohabitation is often in the sole possession of the supported spouse.

I recall reading this in legal research a few years ago, but I can't seem to find it now for a current case I am involved in.

Thanks in advance.

------------------------------
Blake W. Rush, Esq.
Law Office of Blake W. Rush
14 E. Main Street
Clinton, NJ 08809
(908) 713-9800 (PHONE)
(908) 713-9803 (FAX)
www.blakerushlaw.com
------------------------------