DPD,
At the last Burlington County Bench/Bar this issue came up. One of the Family Part judges explained why he does not grant motions to hold someone in contempt but will enter an enforcement of litigant's rights order.
It is as you thought. The procedures for a contempt application written into R. 1:10-2 and the procedures for ELR under 1:10-3 are different. A normal motion does not meet the requirements of 1:10-2 even if the remedy under both rules could be the same.
Andrew
Andrew L. Rochester, Esquire
Morgenstern & Rochester
A Partnership of LLCs
1874 Route 70 East
Suite 4
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003
Telephone: (856)489-6200
Fax: (856)424-6977
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.MandRLaw.net
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication may contain material protected by privilege, including but not limited to the attorney client privilege, work product doctrine or the joint defense privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify Morgenstern & Rochester, by telephone at (856) 489-6200. You will be reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us
Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
Original Message------
I've frequently seen judges deny an application to hold a party in contempt, but find that said party was in violation of litigant's rights.
I assume it's essentially a distinction without a difference as the ultimate remedy (enforcement and sanctions) are the same, but what's the difference and why do judges do this? Is it because only the court can institute a contempt proceeding (Rule 1:10-2) whereas an enforcement application is "to enforce litigant's rights" (R. 1:10-3)?
Thanks,
<x-sigsep>
David Perry Davis, Esq.
----------------------------------------------------
www.FamilyLawNJ.pro
----------------------------------------------------
112 West Franklin Avenue
Pennington, NJ 08534
Voice: 609-737-2222
Fax: 609-737-3222
</x-sigsep>