I think its good to discuss as a group, I hope its ok I post my thoughts:
<<If the "wife" could defeat the fraud claims, could she get an interest in this home that my client technically does not own yet?>>
Even if the marriage wasn't valid, and regardless of ownership, the wife still has a statutory and equitable argument for half the pay down of the mortgage and half the increase in value due to improvements while living together.
Look to Painter v. Painter, 65 N.J. 196, 215-216, 320 A.2d 484 (1974). "In other words, the trial judge had the right not to award plaintiff a one-half interest in the equity in the house if the factors to be considered in making an equitable distribution justified an unequal division of that property. " and "The courts are now empowered to allocate marital assets between the spouses, regardless of ownership." See Gemignani v. Gemignani, 146 N.J.Super. 278, 282, 369 A.2d 942 (App.Div.1977)." Id. at 246. And N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, requires an equitable distribution be "designed to advance the policy of promoting equity and fair dealing between divorcing spouses." Barr v. Barr, 418 N.J. Super. 18, 45, 11 A.3d 875 (App. Div. 2011).
Tom King
Thomas R. King, Esq
O: 973-750-8348 Fax: 888-576-8997
www.njfamily.law - www.njdivorce.law
45 Broadway, 2nd floor, Denville NJ 07834
This e-mail and any attachment(s) are private, confidential, may be legally privileged, and are intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient, please notify us by return e-mail and delete this message.