NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only

Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

  • 1.  Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 03:52 PM
    Hi Everyone,

    Has anyone filed an Answer and Counterclaim which includes, in response, an assertion of R. 1:4-8, requesting sanctions for frivolous litigation? Any guidance is appreciated.


    Thanks,

    JAYDE WIENER, ESQ.
    Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC
    959 S. Springfield Avenue
    Springfield, New Jersey 07081
    973-376-1114 / 973-376-6665 (Fax)
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

    NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments to this e-mail contains information that may be legally privileged and confidential from the firm of Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, transmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by return e-mail or by calling 973-376-1114 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the firm of Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC. This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message leaving this firm.</mailto:[email protected]>


  • 2.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 04:09 PM

    Used to do this all the time right after every knucklehead in town started serving up a standard plate of unsupported domestic torts along with their real complaint, just because they now had the counts at the ready among their word processing files.

     You send them a letter, citing the Rule, and demanding that the frivolous count(s) be withdrawn. They usually write back stating that they wouldn't have plead the counts, had they been frivolous.

    It typically becomes apparent that it's all a bunch of folderol when there's assault counts and no medical examinations, etc. These usually have to go to verdict before much can be done about them, and that seldom happens.


    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585
    ------------------------------




  • 3.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 04:27 PM
    The Rule does not describe including the demand in a formal pleading. You serve a letter upon adversary counsel stating the demand, and giving a Rule-based deadline for retraction of the offending pleading or motion. That's what we do, anyway.



    Hanan




  • 4.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 04:29 PM
    That's exactly what we do. I neglected to mention that we never respond to it in the pleadings, but only in demand letter as already mentioned.

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585
    ------------------------------




  • 5.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 04:31 PM
    the only response in the pleadings is DENY DENY DENY (and a Demand for Plaintiff's Statement of Damages under the Rule in the pleadings).

    Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.
    82 Speedwell Avenue
    Morristown, New Jersey 07960
    973-538-7070
    973-538-7088 Fax
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




  • 6.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-28-2015 06:03 PM
    I believe the Rule requires a R 1:4-8 letter demanding the withdrawal of the offending document upon 28 day notice which you can then use as a basis for a Motion to impose sanctions or an exhibit to seek fees upon final judgment.




  • 7.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 06:47 AM

    I recently received a Rule 1:4-8 notice placed smack dab in the middle of the Answer to our counterclaim.

     

    After the responses to our counterclaim, it stated:

     

    FRIVOLOUS CLAIM NJSA 2A:15-59-1

    "Plaintiff specifically reserves the right to bring a formal motion for relief under the Frivolous Claim Statute set forth at NJSA 2A:15-59.1 et seq.

     

    <then attorney signature>

     

    Then:

    Notice and Demand is hereby given pursuant to NJSA 2A:15-59.1 and Rule 1:4-8 that Count Two of the Counterclaim violates the provisions of Rule 1:4-8 in that recovery against Plaintiff based on Count Two of the Counterclaim is not warranted by existing Law or by a non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing Law or the establishment of new Law; and (b) there is no factual basis for the assertion of Count Two of the Counterclaim.  Demand is hereby made that the complaint be immediately withdrawn.  Notice is given that an application for sanctions will be made within a reasonable time hereafter if the complaint is not withdraw within 28 days of service of this written demand.

     <signed by attorney>

     

     

     

    ------------------------------
    Rachel Cotrino Esq.
    Jackson NJ
    (732)987-9966
    ------------------------------




  • 8.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 07:07 AM
    It can also be plead as an affirmative defense but you should send the letter with the demand in accordance with the rule.

    Alice M. Plastoris, Esq.
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
    (973) 538-7070
    Sent from my iPad

    THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION.




  • 9.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 07:10 AM
    All quite unnecessary. Bluster, IMO.

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585
    ------------------------------




  • 10.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 07:17 AM








    The Rule doesn't require advance judicial notice. It is a private matter until a party files a post-result motion, including a previously issued warning letter. A pleading that includes R. 1:4-8 warning language is calculated to get the judge's attention long before that would otherwise happen. And it doesn't satisfy the letter of the Rule.

    Hanan




    Hanan M. Isaacs, Esq.



    t 609.683.7400 f 609.921.8982

    e [email protected] w www.hananisaacs.com

    4499 Route 27, Kingston NJ












  • 11.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 08:22 AM
    Concur with Hanan. He says "calculated to get the judge's attention;" I say "bluster." Six of one...

    ------------------------------
    Curtis Romanowski Esq.
    Senior Attorney - Proprietor
    Metuchen NJ
    (732)603-8585
    ------------------------------




  • 12.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 09:20 AM
    Thank you everyone for your helpful responses!

    JAYDE WIENER, ESQ.
    Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC
    959 S. Springfield Avenue
    Springfield, New Jersey 07081
    973-376-1114 / 973-376-6665 (Fax)
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

    NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments to this e-mail contains information that may be legally privileged and confidential from the firm of Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, transmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by return e-mail or by calling 973-376-1114 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the firm of Wolkstein, Von Ellen & Brown, LLC. This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail message leaving this firm.




  • 13.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-29-2015 12:05 PM
    The world is going to hell in a handbasket, but the good news is that Curt and Hanan agree with themselves. :=)



    Hanan




  • 14.  RE: Answer and Counterclaim: R. 1:4-8 Frivolous Litigation

    Posted 04-30-2015 06:02 PM








    The Rule doesn't require advance judicial notice. It is a private matter until a party files a post-result motion, including a previously issued warning letter. A pleading that includes R. 1:4-8 warning language is calculated to get the judge's attention long before that would otherwise happen. And it doesn't satisfy the letter of the Rule.

    Hanan




    Hanan M. Isaacs, Esq.



    t 609.683.7400 f 609.921.8982

    e [email protected] w www.hananisaacs.com

    4499 Route 27, Kingston NJ