NJSBA Family Law Section

 View Only
  • 1.  50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 03:49 PM
    77 year old client came in. Married in October of 1963 because Father of girl who was sixteen forced the two of them to get married. Town can't find marriage certificate from back then. They really never lived together and separated almost immediately. Go figure...he wants to get married. Never served with a divorce complaint that he knows of. She lived in Queens. Hired an investigator who other than providing services which he paid for, found nothing. Other than telling him not to get married.....any suggestions?

    Lawrence D. Forster
    Forster & Arbore
    Tel: (973) 584-1501
    Fax: (973) 584-3150

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
    The information contained in this electronic communication is confidential and may be a privileged attorney-client communication. It is intended only for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer or facsimile system. Thank you.


  • 2.  RE: 50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 03:54 PM
    File a complaint. Serve her by publication and cross your fingers.




  • 3.  RE: 50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 03:59 PM
    I would probably hire my own investigator.  Have had good success with State of the Art Security.  Would the State have a copy?  If all efforts are exhausted, service by publication.

    -------------------------------------------
    David Molk Esq.
    Ridgefield Park NJ
    (201) 440-3400
    -------------------------------------------




  • 4.  RE: 50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 04:01 PM
    77 yr old can file for divorce or perhaps annulment (sounds like the marriage wasn't consummated) and file a motion for service by publication.  However, from an elder law perspective, if one of them needs long term care, both of their assets (including retirement assets) get spent down (except for about $113K for the community or well spouse.  Client is old enough to qualify for domestic  partner instead.

    -------------------------------------------
    Gabrielle Strich Esq.
    Princeton NJ
    (609)924-2900
    -------------------------------------------




  • 5.  RE: 50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 04:11 PM
    Just remember the investigator report may not be considered "due diligence" under the Rules 5:4-4(c)(2)

    -------------------------------------------
    Corinne Campi Esq.
    Wall Township NJ
    (732)556-0525
    -------------------------------------------




  • 6.  RE: 50 years of separation

    Posted 12-08-2014 05:21 PM
    I am not clear. Are you saying that you have not been able to find the female in Queens, or wherever? If that's true, I think you have to do a little more digging to find her for the affidavit of due diligence. Some of these detectives can utilize the computer to find anyone. My guess is that if she works, a computer-savvy detective will find her. Everybody knows such a detective; call me if you need one.



    And she may want to be found anyway, because she may have "remarried" as well herself. So, if she didn't sue your client for divorce in the past, she may be very interested in cleaning up the mess as well in order to legitimize her own current marriage. There is certainly a record of the marriage you are inquiring about in Trenton (or Albany), even if there is none in the municipality.



    Maybe the first thing to do is the cheapest and simplest. Besides getting a marriage certificate from the state, try getting a record of a judgment of divorce from Albany. Maybe she did a publication against him. You may find out you have no problem.



    I saw the comment about "crossing your fingers". Frankly, being separated for 50 years makes it rather unlikely that your client is in any prejudicial situation vis-à-vis the divorce case that you file. But he is going to have to get divorced, obviously.



    Good luck.



    Description: cid:809112918@04052012-2ECF

    Mark F. Saker, Esquire

    Attorney ID #271831971
    Cerrato, Saker & Wilder
    A Professional Corporation
    819 Route 33
    Freehold, New Jersey 07728
    O: (732) 431-5000 X 125
    F: (732) 462-0483
    C: (732) 915-5190
    E: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]



    INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E‑MAIL TRANSMISSION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL AND INTENDED ONLY FOR USE BY THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY INDICATED TO BE THE RECIPIENT. IF THE RECEIVER OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT FROM YOUR SYSTEM WITHOUT COPYING OR FORWARDING IT, AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY REPLY E‑MAIL. THANK YOU!



    TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

    P Consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Please print this e-mail only if necessary.